MP Helen Hayes is hoping to get ‘Georgia’s Law’ – which would ensure additional protection for secure social housing tenants who are forced to move home due to a threat of violence – onto the statute book.
In a Commons debate the Dulwich and West Norwood MP told fellow MPs she was planning to move an amendment to the proposed Social Housing (Regulation) Bill.
And – on hearing Helen Hayes story of what Georgia and her family faced – a Government minister Dehenna Davidson told the Dulwich and West Norwood Labour MP she would like to “discuss that further” before the Bill reaches committee stage in the Commons.
“My constituent Georgia found herself in those circumstances. Georgia and her children were happy in their housing association home, where they had lived for nine years, when her oldest son was threatened by gang members who came to the flat one Saturday afternoon while Georgia was at work.
“She worked for the NHS.
“Georgia went to the police, who told her that her son’s life was at risk and she had to move immediately for his safety.
“Her whole life and those of her children were turned upside down in that instant.
“Georgia’s local council provided temporary accommodation in another borough, but it was really poor quality and without enough space for her sons to study properly.
“She had been there for a year when her case came to my attention.
“The move and the place that they were forced to live in took a terrible toll on Georgia and her children.
“Having referred her to the council for temporary accommodation, Georgia’s housing association began steps to end her secure tenancy, essentially sending her to the bottom of the housing list, facing a wait of many years before there would be any chance at all of being offered another secure tenancy.
“My amendment would create a new obligation on social landlords, whether councils or housing associations, to protect the tenancy rights of secure tenants who have had to move due to a risk of violence, and create a new duty on them to co-operate with each other when a tenant needs to move area for their own safety.”
Helen Hayes told fellow MPs the amendment is supported by both Shelter and the National Housing Federation.
In her summing-up response Dehenna Davison Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities) 6:55 pm, 7th November 2022 said: “Helen Hayes spoke of Georgia’s law.
“I cannot begin to imagine how difficult Georgia and her son’s experience must have been, but I would be grateful for the opportunity to sit down with the hon. Member to discuss that further before we get to the Committee stage.”
Dehenna Davidson also praised housing activist Kwajo “for his tireless campaigning. “Stories like his prove why it is so crucial that we pass the Bill today” the minister added.
Helen Hayes statement to the House follows in full:
Helen Hayes Shadow Minister (Education) 5:44 pm, 7th November 2022
The need for secure, genuinely affordable social housing is one of the biggest issues facing my constituents. It forces too many of them into the instability of temporary accommodation, it blights the health of constituents forced to live in damp, overcrowded accommodation and it holds back children and young people who are unable to fulfil their potential at school because of the conditions at home. So I support the principles of this Bill, the strengthening of regulations that it will deliver and its potential to improve the quality of existing homes, but it is not a solution to the whole of the housing crisis that we face—a housing crisis that deepens and worsens with every passing year. Without central Government investment in new, genuinely affordable social housing and the proper regulation of the private rented sector, my constituents will continue to suffer.
I want to speak today about an amendment that I will be tabling to the Bill, which I hope the Government will support. The amendment, which is supported by Shelter and the National Housing Federation, seeks to ensure additional protection for secure social housing tenants who are forced to move home due to a threat of violence. My constituent Georgia found herself in those circumstances. Georgia and her children were happy in their housing association home, where they had lived for nine years, when her oldest son was threatened by gang members who came to the flat one Saturday afternoon while Georgia was at work. She worked for the NHS. Georgia went to the police, who told her that her son’s life was at risk and she had to move immediately for his safety. Her whole life and those of her children were turned upside down in that instant.
Georgia’s local council provided temporary accommodation in another borough, but it was really poor quality and without enough space for her sons to study properly. She had been there for a year when her case came to my attention. The move and the place that they were forced to live in took a terrible toll on Georgia and her children. Having referred her to the council for temporary accommodation, Georgia’s housing association began steps to end her secure tenancy, essentially sending her to the bottom of the housing list, facing a wait of many years before there would be any chance at all of being offered another secure tenancy.
My amendment would create a new obligation on social landlords, whether councils or housing associations, to protect the tenancy rights of secure tenants who have had to move due to a risk of violence, and create a new duty on them to co-operate with each other when a tenant needs to move area for their own safety. These simple measures will mitigate the already serious and traumatising effects of serious violence, particularly gang- related violence, on families. It will help to prevent one moment in a young person’s life from destabilising their whole family and help them to focus on getting the support they need. It will stop families needlessly entering an already overwhelmed social housing waiting list and minimise the time spent in temporary accommodation.
In the end, after more than a year in temporary accommodation and following my intervention, Georgia and her children were rehoused by their housing association within a week, but not before they had suffered horrific consequences. There are some details of this case that it is not appropriate for me to share in this Chamber. I hope that colleagues will believe me when I say that Georgia and her family suffered consequences that no family should ever have to bear as a result of the destabilisation that they faced.
I have encountered similar cases in which families know that their secure tenancy will be at risk if they move due to a risk of violence, so they avoid that by sending the young person who is at risk of violence away to live with family or friends. Again, the amendment would give security to those residents: there would be a limit to the instability they face and help to prevent a crisis from turning into a tragedy. There are too many families in my constituency who are suffering the trauma of serious violence in our communities, and it is the responsibility of all of us to do everything possible to mitigate its impacts. This amendment would do that. Georgia’s law would help to ensure that other families did not suffer as Georgia’s family have, and I commend it to the House.
Question put and agreed to. Bill accordingly read a Second time. (Source: TheyWorkForYou)
NEWS FROM CRYSTAL PALACE 